Types of TEVALs and standard items

A range of instruments for surveying student perception of teaching and learning has been developed for use at UQ. Each TEVAL consists of a number of compulsory set questions. Most TEVALs also allow room for optional items to be added. See a sample TEVAL questionnaire (PDF 95KB). All TEVALs also give students the opportunity to write open-ended comments on areas of strength and those in need of improvement. 

TEVAL compulsory items

The compulsory items for each available instrument are listed below to assist you in deciding which TEVAL is most appropriate for you. 

• Lecturing
• Tutoring
• Clinical Teaching
• Distance/flexible
• Independent project (Undergraduate)
• Problem-based learning tutor (General)
• Thesis (Postgraduate – Hons/Mas/PHD)
• Advisor (Postgraduate – Hons/Mas/PHD)
• Music tuition – instrumental
• Music
• Tour course
• Problem-based learning tutor (MEDI)
  

Lecturing TEVAL

1. The lecturer produced classes that were well organised 
2. The lecturer presented material in an interesting way 
3. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on my work 
4. The lecturer treated students with respect 
5. The lecturer seemed to know the course well 
6. The lecturer communicated his/her enthusiasm for the course 
7. The lecturer emphasised thinking rather than just memorising 
8. The lecturer gave explanations that were clear 
9. The lecturer was available for consultation 
10. The lecturer helped me to improve my learning skills 

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.

Tutoring TEVAL

1. The tutor used time constructively to cover important points 
2. The tutor was effective in stimulating my interest 
3. The tutor created a pleasant, friendly learning environment 
4. The tutor encouraged students to participate actively 
5. The tutor helped me to develop ideas further 
6. The tutor treated me with respect 
7. The tutor gave clear explanations 
8. The tutor seemed knowledgeable 
9. The tutor communicated enthusiasm for the material 
10. The tutor helped me to improve my learning skills

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher?

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.      

Clinical Teaching TEVAL

1. The clinical teacher gave clear demonstrations and explanations of clinical material
2. The clinical teacher inspired me to develop rapport and to empathise with the patient and/or his or her family
3. The clinical teacher demonstrated how theoretical knowledge can be applied in a clinical situation 
4. The clinical teacher spent sufficient time in demonstrating treatment techniques 
5. The clinical teacher monitored my clinical progress critically and constructively 
6. The clinical teacher made clear the criteria used for student assessment 
7. The clinical teacher was willing to assist me when I needed assistance 
8. The clinical teacher was courteous towards students 
9. The clinical teacher was a good role model 
10. Feedback on clinical and other work was helpful 

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.

Distance/flexible TEVAL

1. The study materials were organized to ensure maximum learning
2. The learning objectives of the course were clear 
3. The study materials gave a clear guide to the contents of the course 
4. There was adequate guidance as to how to approach study in this course 
5. The study materials stimulated my interest in the course 
6. The Lecturer gave adequate feedback on my work 
7. The assessment requirements were clear 
8. The Lecturer was approachable to answer questions 
9. The structure of the course has helped me to develop the ability to work independently 
10. The course was structured to help me to improve my learning skills. 

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.

Independent project (Undergraduate) TEVAL

1. The course was structured to ensure maximum learning 
2. My supervisor gave me with sufficient guidance to select and clarify my topic. 
3. My supervisor provides me with appropriate guidance with respect to the literature in my research area. 
4. My supervisor provides me with appropriate guidance about research ethics. 
5. The supervisor seemed willing to offer individual help 
6. My supervisor is available for discussions/consultations when needed. 
7. I have improved my ability to work independently 
8. I have learned to think more critically 
9. I liked the self-paced approach of the course 
10. The assessment requirements were clear 

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.

Problem-based learning tutor TEVAL (General)

1. The PBL Tutor kept the group focused on the task
2. The PBL Tutor gave me feedback on my contribution
3. The PBL Tutor inspired the group to learn
4. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to summarise and restate the problem as we proceeded through the case
5. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to ask appropriate questions to test hypotheses
6. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to generate learning objectives relevant to the problem
7. The PBL Tutor facilitated resolution of group conflicts
8. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to identify all relevant cues in the triggers
9. The PBL Tutor invited constructive feedback on his/her performance
10. The PBL Tutor encouraged the group to review and refine learning objectives covered in the previous session
11. The PBL Tutor encouraged the group to reflect on its performance
12. The PBL Tutor fostered a learning environment that was supporting, accepting and non-judgemental
13. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to share learning with the group
14. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to consider mechanisms underlying hypotheses
15. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to hypothesise logically and broadly
16. The PBL Tutor challenged our understanding
17. The PBL Tutor encouraged involvement of group members
18. The PBL Tutor was prepared for each tutorial
19. The PBL Tutor encouraged us to test hypotheses thoroughly
20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university tutor? 

Note: There is no provision for adding optional items for this TEVAL

Thesis (Postgraduate - Hons/Mas/PhD) TEVAL

1. My supervisor provides me with appropriate guidance with respect to the literature in my research area. 
2. My supervisor helped me to develop the ability to do research independently. 
3. My supervisor provides me with appropriate guidance about research ethics. 
4. I feel comfortable raising with my supervisor issues which concern me. 
5. My supervisor and I have worked out the degree to which he/she will be involved in the research 
6. My supervisor is available for discussions/consultations when needed. 
7. My supervisor reads my work in a timely manner. 
8. My supervisor engages in constructive discussions with me about my progress. 
9. My supervisor gives adequate guidance to help me publish my research 
10. My supervisor encourages me to present my work at appropriate seminars and conferences. 
11. My supervisor gives me useful feeback on written work 
12. My supervisor and I have worked out the degree to which he/she will be involved in the writing and revision of my thesis 

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 13 – 19.

Advisor (Postgraduate - Hons/Mas/PhD) TEVAL

1. My advisor reads my work in a timely manner
2. My advisor engages in constructive discussions with me about my progress
3. My advisor and I have worked out the degree to which he/she will be involved in the research
4. My advisor is available for discussions/consultations when needed
5. My advisor provides me with appropriate guidance about research ethics
6. I feel comfortable raising with my advisor issues which concern me
7. My advisor provides me with appropriate guidance with respect to the literature in my research area
8. My advisor helped me to develop the ability to do research independently
9. My advisor gives me useful feedback on written work
10. My advisor and I have worked out the degree to which he/she will be involved in the writing and revision of my thesis
11. My advisor gives adequate guidance to help me publish my research
12. My advisor encourages me to present my work at appropriate seminars and conferences
13. My advisor adapts to my individual learning needs
14. My advisor treats me with respect
15. My advisor values my contribution to the research project
16. I fell like part of a research team when I work with my advisor
17. My advisor understands the demands of my other commitments
18. I would choose to work with my advisor again in the future

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a post-graduate research advisor? 

Note: An optional item can be inserted for question 19.

Music tuition – instrumental  TEVAL

1. Lessons were given at the scheduled time, or necessary changes to the scheduled lessons were planned in advance
2. The lessons explored material in an interesting way
3. The lessons involved discussion in relation to goals, both short-term and long-term
4. The lessons provided me with practice skills for further exploration
5. The lecturer involved with this course communicated his/her enthusiasm for practical music
6. The lecturer involved in this course discussed issues that were thought-provoking
7. The lecturer convincingly demonstrated what he/she wanted me to achieve
8. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on my work
9. The lessons help to improve my musical sills
10. A technical program was devised which supported with repertoire chosen
11. Suggestions for improvement were clearly explained
12. The lecturer treated me with respect 
13. The lecturer seems to know the subject matter well
14. The lecturer helped me to teach myself

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 15 – 19.

Music TEVAL

1. The course was well organised
2. Necessary variants to the printed timetable were properly communicated
3. The course co-ordinator presented sessions that were engaging
4. The course co-ordinator gave suggestions that were clear
5. The course co-ordinator gave suggestions that offered options for further exploration
6. These classes helped me to improve my teaching skills
7. These classes provided me with sufficient opportunity for practising my conducting skills with an ensemble
8. The co-ordinator gave adequate feedback on my work
9. The co-ordinator treated students with respect
10. The course co-ordinator seemed to know the subject well

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher?

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 11 – 19.

Tour course TEVAL

1. The tour leader produced learning activities that were well organised
2. The tour leader gave adequate feedback on my work
3. The tour leader treated students with respect
4. The tour leader seemed to know the course well
5. The tour leader communicated his/her enthusiasm for the course
6. The tour leader emphasised thinking rather than just memorising
7. The tour leaders was available for consultation
8. The tour leader helped me to improve my learning skills
9. I have developed the ability to solve problems in the field
10. The tour leader suggests specific ways students can improve
11. Case studies and group discussion aided understanding of the course
12. I have learned the relevance of this course to my academic studies
13. Sessions were structured to provide good learning 
14. I have learned to make connections between this course and others
15. Technical and support staff were accessible and helpful

20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a university teacher? 

Note: Optional items can be inserted for questions 16 – 19.

Problem-based learning tutor (MEDI)

1. My group was inspired to learn by the PBL Tutor
2. I found the learning environment fostered by the PBL Tutor to be supportive, accepting, and non-judgmental
3. Members of my group were encouraged by the PBL Tutor to become involved in the group task
4. My group remained on task under the guidance of the PBL Tutor
5. My group was encouraged by the PBL Tutor to identify all relevant cues in the triggers
6. My group was assisted by the PBL Tutor in generating learning objectives relevant to the problem
7. I could see a link between what I learned in PBL Tutorials and the course learning objectives
8. My group was encouraged to hypothesise broadly and logically by the PBL Tutor
9. My group was assisted in considering mechanisms underlying hypotheses by the PBL Tutor
10. My group was encouraged by the PBL Tutor to test hypotheses by asking questions
11. My group was encouraged to test hypotheses thoroughly by the PBL Tutor
12. My group was prompted by the PBL Tutor to summarise and restate problems as we proceeded through the case
13. My understanding was challenged by the questions and issues raised by the PBL Tutor
14. We were given opportunities by the PBL tutor to share learning and resources
15. I received feedback on my contribution from the PBL Tutor
16. My group was encouraged by the PBL Tutor to reflect on the quality of its performance and to set goals for future learning
17. I was encouraged to review what I had learnt and how I had learnt it by the PBL Tutor
18. I found PBL Tutorials to be well-prepared, well organised and generally run according to time
19. I was invited to give the PBL tutor constructive feedback on his/her performance
20. All things considered, how would you rate this staff member's overall effectiveness as a PBL Tutor?

Note: There is no provision for adding optional items for this TEVAL.

Open-ended comments

The reverse side of every TEVAL gives students the opportunity to write open-ended comments in response to the following questions;

1. What are this staff member’s strengths in teaching?
2. What improvements would you suggest?
3. Do you have any comments or recommendations concerning the use of this questionnaire and its timing?

The comments are not analysed by TEDI but are returned, in their raw form, to the lecturer or tutor who was evaluated to assist in identifying strengths and potential improvements

 

 

TEDI home | About TEDI | Teaching & learning support | Evaluation services
Staff development | What's on | Site map

Copyright | Privacy | Feedback
© 2006 The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
Phone: +61 (7) 3365 2788    Email:
Authorised by: Director, TEDI     Last modified: Wednesday November 04 2009